Back to search

False-Positive Psychology

Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant

DSEID
DSEID-002-7239200
DOI
10.1177/0956797611417632
Journal
Psychological Science
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-11
Status
temporarily_unreachable

Abstract

In this article, we accomplish two things. First, we show that despite empirical psychologists’ nominal endorsement of a low rate of false-positive findings (≤ .05), flexibility in data collection, analysis, and reporting dramatically increases actual false-positive rates. In many cases, a researcher is more likely to falsely find evidence that an effect exists than to correctly find evidence that it does not. We present computer simulations and a pair of actual experiments that demonstrate how unacceptably easy it is to accumulate (and report) statistically significant evidence for a false hypothesis. Second, we suggest a simple, low-cost, and straightforwardly effective disclosure-based solution to this problem. The solution involves six concrete requirements for authors and four guidelines for reviewers, all of which impose a minimal burden on the publication process.

A lawful full-text candidate was found, but the source was temporarily unreachable. The worker can retry later.

PDF

No local PDF is available.

GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.

This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.

No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.

Metadata

Title
False-Positive Psychology
Delta ID
DSEID-002-7239200
Authors
Joseph P. Simmons, Leif D. Nelson, Uri Simonsohn
Abstract source
crossref
Source URL
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
Access
closed_or_uncertain
Licence
unknown
PDF SHA-256
TEI SHA-256
GROBID
Full-text discovery attempts
ProviderStatusKindURLReason
crossref_resource failed pdf https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797611417632 Source returned HTTP 403.
crossref_link failed pdf https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0956797611417632 Source returned HTTP 403.
crossref_link failed xml https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full-xml/10.1177/0956797611417632 Source returned HTTP 403.
openalex failed pdf https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 Source returned HTTP 403.
openalex fetched pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22006061 text/html
openalex html_links_extracted pdf https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22006061
doi_landing failed html https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632 Source returned HTTP 403.

Issues

No public issues have been filed for this DOI.

Submit an issue

Record history

No public record history yet.