The traditionalist illusion: How conventional gender role items obscure egalitarian views
Abstract
Survey items that capture attitudes towards gender roles in the private and public spheres typically only measure agreement with a traditional gender role attitude. Respondents who disagree with such items may hold egalitarian views – favouring either equality or role-reversal – or may endorse pluralist beliefs. Using data from the ESS CRONOS Survey, we contrast a conventional measure of gender attitudes with an alternative version that clearly distinguishes between traditional, equality and role-reversal positions. Analysing responses to the question of whether men make better political leaders than women, we find that most respondents support gender equality, with only 15% favouring male and 10% female leadership. Notably, nearly half of the respondents classified as traditionalists based on agreement with the conventional item report equality beliefs when offered distinct egalitarian response options. These findings underscore the limitations of conventional scales in capturing the diversity of gender role attitudes.
Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.
No local PDF is available.
GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.
This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.
No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.
Metadata
Issues
No public issues have been filed for this DOI.
Submit an issue
Record history
| When | Event | Field | Old | New |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00 | identifier_assigned | DSEID | DSEID-001-1783563 |