Culture wars and classism: Christian nationalism, economic position, and Americans’ approval of inequality
Abstract
Abstract The United States has witnessed a concomitant rise in economic inequality and increasingly explicit Christian nationalist rhetoric at multiple levels of governance. Yet research has not examined how Americans’ views on Christian nationalism might justify the economic inequality. We theorize a connection between Christian nationalism and approval of economic inequality, but one contingent on economic position. Building on scholarship showing how White racial in-group commitments interact with Christian nationalism to sacralize racial hierarchies, we theorize Christian nationalism unites those who gain from economic inequality, and thus, it should drive support for economic inequality most among higher-earning Americans. Analyses of the 2021 General Social Survey affirm Christian nationalism is consistently associated with Americans’ approval of economic inequality by numerous indicators, whether in the abstract or concretely regarding education and health. However, interactions reveal this association is isolated to Americans in the highest income quartile. Replication with the 2014 Boundaries in American Mosaic survey and Pew’s 2024 American Trends Panel survey shows the same pattern: Christian nationalism and approval of economic inequality are associated primarily among higher-earners. Thus, despite lower-income Americans being more likely to embrace Christian nationalism overall, it is not bound up with their views on economic inequality. Rather, Christian nationalism is associated with approval of economic inequality among those who benefit from it, namely, higher-income Americans. Our findings thus hold implications for understanding religion’s contingent role in shaping Americans’ acceptance of inequality.
Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.
No local PDF is available.
GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.
This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.
No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.
Metadata
Issues
No public issues have been filed for this DOI.
Submit an issue
Record history
| When | Event | Field | Old | New |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00 | identifier_assigned | DSEID | DSEID-000-8326560 |