Back to search

Cruel and Usual: Recursive Racial Cruelty at the US Immigration Courts

DSEID
DSEID-001-5929690
DOI
10.1111/1468-4446.70120
Journal
The British Journal of Sociology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2026-4-25
Status
metadata_only

Abstract

ABSTRACT In this paper, I advance a theorization of recursive racial cruelty by focusing on the suffering of racialized respondents in the US immigration courts and connecting it to the routine functioning of the US empire and colonial racial capitalism. Immigration courts operate within the US Department of Justice (DOJ), where immigration judges hear the government's removal (deportation) cases against non‐citizen residents and adjudicate their right to stay in the US. As the legal avenue for settling questions of deportation and asylum, these courts are often posed as humane and just alternatives to the spectacular public displays of cruelty involving militarized raids, abductions, and expedited deportations (sometimes to third‐country prisons) that have characterized Trump's two terms in office. Using ethnographic data from 42 cases in Boston from 2020–2022, which took place during both Trump and Biden's presidential terms, I argue that the immigration courts are in fact a parallel public‐facing vehicle and staging ground for racial cruelty for the US empire‐state. In the immigration courts, a combination of de jure and de facto practices work daily to reinforce a racialized politics of imperial membership. In the process, it also circulates money out of the hands of racialized respondents and their families, so that eventually profit can be made. Furthermore, the racial cruelty exercised in the immigration courts, is recursive in two ways. For each immigrant respondent, such cruelty recurs and builds in every stage of the court proceedings, from the initial hearing to the adjudication of bond to the final deportation order, and through their everyday experience in proximate institutions such as detention centers. As a result of the ongoing effects of US (and more broadly, Euro‐American) imperialism in much of the world, racial cruelty also recurs generationally and sometimes transnationally during immigrant respondents' lifetimes. By advancing a theory of recursive racial cruelty, this article contributes to decolonial theory building and bridges sociological literature on US immigration, race, organizations, empire, and political economy.

Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.

Publisher or DOI landing page

PDF

No local PDF is available.

GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.

This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.

No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.

Metadata

Title
Cruel and Usual: Recursive Racial Cruelty at the US Immigration Courts
Delta ID
DSEID-001-5929690
Authors
Nabila N. Islam
Abstract source
crossref
Source URL
None
Access
closed_or_uncertain
Licence
unknown
PDF SHA-256
TEI SHA-256
GROBID

Issues

No public issues have been filed for this DOI.

Submit an issue

Record history

WhenEventFieldOldNew
2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00identifier_assignedDSEIDDSEID-001-5929690