Dual-Process Theory, Behavioral Research, and the Explanation of Social Inequalities
Abstract
This article explores how dual-process theory (DPT) can be articulated to build a comprehensive toolbox of mechanisms for explaining social phenomena and, more specifically, social inequalities. I argue that a major strength of Evans and Stanovich’s dual-process approach is that it recognizes the heuristic relevance of both automatic and controlled processes and specifies the conditions of their activation, providing a situated perspective on human rationality. This approach moves beyond the duality of processes to articulate the psychological architecture and dynamics of decision-making. I outline how social researchers can derive several explanatory mechanisms of social phenomena from this framework. I develop a typology of inequality-generating mechanisms and apply it to the analysis of social class, gender, and ethno-racial inequalities, arguing that this approach offers a more comprehensive understanding of social inequalities than do bounded rationality and Bourdieusian approaches.
Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.
No local PDF is available.
GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.
This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.
No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.
Metadata
Issues
No public issues have been filed for this DOI.
Submit an issue
Record history
| When | Event | Field | Old | New |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00 | identifier_assigned | DSEID | DSEID-001-9107649 |