Back to search

Understanding the “Grievance Studies Affair” Papers and Why They Should Be Reinstated: A Response to Geoff Cole

DSEID
DSEID-001-0049323
DOI
10.1177/00491241211009946
Journal
Sociological Methods & Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2021-11
Status
metadata_only

Abstract

In April, 2020, Dr. Geoff Cole published, “Why the ‘Hoax’ Paper of Baldwin (2018) Should Be Reinstated.” We are the authors of the “Baldwin” paper published in Fat Studies. The paper satirized theoretical ideas within Fat Studies as part of a larger project to demonstrate the lack of rigor in certain theoretical approaches to cultural studies. In this response, we agree with Cole that our project should not be understood as hoaxes and that the retracted article should be reinstated, but defend our methods.

Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.

Publisher or DOI landing page

PDF

No local PDF is available.

GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.

This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.

No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.

Metadata

Title
Understanding the “Grievance Studies Affair” Papers and Why They Should Be Reinstated: A Response to Geoff Cole
Delta ID
DSEID-001-0049323
Authors
Helen Pluckrose, James Lindsay, Peter Boghossian
Abstract source
crossref
Source URL
None
Access
closed_or_uncertain
Licence
unknown
PDF SHA-256
TEI SHA-256
GROBID

Issues

No public issues have been filed for this DOI.

Submit an issue

Record history

WhenEventFieldOldNew
2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00identifier_assignedDSEIDDSEID-001-0049323