Gaming and Performance Metrics in Higher Education: The Consequences of Journal Lists
Abstract
This article analyses ‘gaming’ in higher education as a response to performance metrics. It shows how scholars react to performance measurement systems in the form of journal lists that define appropriate outlets for their research. Two types of gaming are identified: the adaptation of research methods and topics to align with the perceived ideals of top US journals, and strategic networking with editors and potential reviewers before submitting articles to prestigious journals. We employ scripting theory to analyse performance measurement and its consequences, differentiating between three levels of scripting: cultural scripts, represented by journal lists; interactional scripts, characterised by participants’ redefinitions/enactments of these overarching scripts; and intrapsychic scripts, focusing on participants’ self-scripting and personal attitudes towards gaming in academia. The study is based on qualitative interviews with 173 associate and full professors in the social sciences in Denmark.
Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.
No local PDF is available.
GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.
This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.
No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.
Metadata
Issues
No public issues have been filed for this DOI.
Submit an issue
Record history
| When | Event | Field | Old | New |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00 | identifier_assigned | DSEID | DSEID-001-2150127 |