Back to search

The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme

DSEID
DSEID-007-2005775
DOI
10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences
Publisher
The Royal Society
Published
1979-9-21
Status
temporarily_unreachable

Abstract

Abstract An adaptationist programme has dominated evolutionary thought in England and the United States during the past 40 years. It is based on faith in the power of natural selection as an optimizing agent. It proceeds by breaking an organism into unitary ‘traits’ and proposing an adaptive story for each considered separately. Trade-offs among competing selective demands exert the only brake upon perfection; non-optimality is thereby rendered as a result of adaptation as well. We criticize this approach and attempt to reassert a competing notion (long popular in continental Europe) that organisms must be analysed as integrated wholes, with Baupläne so constrained by phyletic heritage, pathways of development and general architecture that the constraints themselves become more interesting and more important in delimiting pathways of change than the selective force that may mediate change when it occurs. We fault the adaptationist programme for its failure to distinguish current utility from reasons for origin (male tyrannosaurs may have used their diminutive front legs to titillate female partners, but this will not explain why they got so small); for its unwillingness to consider alternatives to adaptive stories; for its reliance upon plausibility alone as a criterion for accepting speculative tales; and for its failure to consider adequately such competing themes as random fixation of alleles, production of non-adaptive structures by developmental correlation with selected features (allometry, pleiotropy, material compensation, mechanically forced correlation), the separability of adaptation and selection, multiple adaptive peaks, and current utility as an epiphenomenon of non-adaptive structures. We support Darwin’s own pluralistic approach to identifying the agents of evolutionary change.

A lawful full-text candidate was found, but the source was temporarily unreachable. The worker can retry later.

PDF

No local PDF is available.

GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.

This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.

No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.

Metadata

Title
The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme
Delta ID
DSEID-007-2005775
Authors
S. J. Gould, R. C. Lewontin
Abstract source
crossref
Source URL
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086
Access
closed_or_uncertain
Licence
unknown
PDF SHA-256
TEI SHA-256
GROBID
Full-text discovery attempts
ProviderStatusKindURLReason
crossref_resource failed html https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article/205/1161/581/33143/The-spandrels-of-San-Marco-and-the-Panglossian Source returned HTTP 403.
crossref_link failed pdf https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 Source returned HTTP 403.
crossref_link failed pdf https://royalsocietypublishing.org/rspb/article-pdf/205/1161/581/171995/rspb.1979.0086.pdf Source returned HTTP 403.
openalex failed pdf https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 Source returned HTTP 403.
doi_landing failed html https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1979.0086 Source returned HTTP 403.

Issues

No public issues have been filed for this DOI.

Submit an issue

Record history

No public record history yet.