Back to search

Outgroups and ingroups: how support for torture and aggressive counterterrorism policies varies by extremist type

DSEID
DSEID-000-7021724
DOI
10.1093/sf/soaf190
Journal
Social Forces
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2025-11-23
Status
metadata_only

Abstract

Abstract As domestic terrorism has become central to US national security, the American public has shown divided reactions to political violence. In the current context of increasing political polarization and racial tension, we draw on social identity theory to compare responses to Islamist, left-wing, and right-wing terrorism and identify moderators of those responses. Analyses of data from a 2022 national survey experiment (n = 1,300) reveal that Americans’ responses to terrorism depend heavily on who is doing the terrorizing. Whereas Americans are equally outraged by Islamist, right-wing, and left-wing terrorism, support for controversial policies varies by terrorist type, with greater support for the use of torture on Islamist terrorists. Our findings also point toward the importance of Republicanism and white nationalist sentiment. Compared to Democrats, Republicans were more supportive of policy and the use of torture targeting Islamist terrorists and less supportive of policy targeting right-wing extremists. In addition, white nationalist sentiment corresponded to increased support for aggressive counterterrorism policy and the use of torture when applied to left-wing and Islamist terrorists. As public opinion is key to the development of government policies, it is critical that policymakers recognize the role of outgroup animosity in public support of counterterrorism measures.

Metadata is indexed. Open-access discovery has not completed for this record yet.

Publisher or DOI landing page

PDF

No local PDF is available.

GROBID Extracted text; discontinued.

This text is generated from TEI extraction for accessibility, search, and TTS. Formulas, tables, figures, page layout, and references may not perfectly match the original PDF.

No accessible text representation is available. The text extraction service has been discontinued for the time being. If you require this service, for accessibility or any other reason, please submit an issue/request on this page.

Metadata

Title
Outgroups and ingroups: how support for torture and aggressive counterterrorism policies varies by extremist type
Delta ID
DSEID-000-7021724
Authors
Murat Haner, Melissa M Sloan, Justin T Pickett, Francis T Cullen
Abstract source
crossref
Source URL
None
Access
closed_or_uncertain
Licence
unknown
PDF SHA-256
TEI SHA-256
GROBID

Issues

No public issues have been filed for this DOI.

Submit an issue

Record history

WhenEventFieldOldNew
2026-06-18 19:37:53.011249+00:00identifier_assignedDSEIDDSEID-000-7021724